- News from ADP
- ADP News 2012
- ADP News 2011
-
ADP News 2010
- Payroll software costing businesses more than £104,280 per year
- ADP and Decathlon make a winning team
- ADP closes acquisition of OneClickHR plc
- IPP awards first re-accredited payroll quality standard to ADP
- Page and Moy Travel Group set off on payroll journey with ADP
- ADP named Payroll Employer of the Year for third year running
-
ADP News 2009
- ADP UK to introduce employment screening through partnership with BackCheck
- ADP scoops two awards at payroll ceremony
- ADP passes the test for SHL
- Harwoods chooses ADP to support business acceleration
- ADP - A partner for life
- ADP toasts deal with Adnams
- ADP extends ADP Streamline, its offering designed for multinationals, to 45 countries
- Nimax Theatres (UK) chooses ADP to stage payroll
- ADP News 2008
- ADP News 2007
-
ADP News 2006
- IKEA selects ADP for GlobalView HR and Payroll service in 40 countries
- ADP launches ADP freedom 2.10 - payroll and HR for the entire employee lifecycle
- ADP freedom tunes up as headline act for Hard Rock Cafe
- Leading global clinical research organisation ICON, switch to ADP freedom in the UK
- ADP Launches Free multi-lingual HR lexicon on-line
- Dermalogica looks forward to soothing balm of ADP freedom
- ADP and Deloitte makes easy work of Financial Reporting Law
- ADP Industry news
9 out of 10 businesses do not use a background check service during recruitment
Almost 9 in 10 (87%) of businesses in the UK do not use a background check service during recruitment, yet nearly two thirds say that they have encountered misrepresentations in applications from outside candidates.
Research cited on Personnel Today revealed that many misrepresentations about personal experience which could be caught by an employment screening strategy are likely slipping past UK businesses. With one third of respondents claiming that false details on candidates CVs have had a large impact on their business, the need for a background check service seems apparent.
Educational qualifications appear to be particularly open to misrepresentation, according to the figures.
78% of those who said they had experienced misrepresentation on CVs said they had seen candidates inflate their degrees, whilst 38% had encountered falsified A-level or GCSE level qualifications. A further 55% said they had seen unqualified candidates claiming to hold a degree level certification, whilst 20% said that candidate’s had claimed on their CVs that they had attended a more prestigious establishment than they had in reality.
The second biggest area of concern was the prevalence of false or misleading references. 68% of respondents said they had encountered this in the past. Other areas of the CV open to abuse include misrepresentation of experience and competency – encountered by 40% of firms – whilst 28% said they had seen experienced false facts about employment details such as length of employment or salary.
The survey also revealed that the biggest issue for vetting incoming staff for businesses was the accuracy, reliability and validity of information provided by referencing (35%). 16% said that companies providing references were often unwilling to give anything but the most basic information on a candidate’s skills, knowledge, technical ability or experience.
Research cited on Personnel Today revealed that many misrepresentations about personal experience which could be caught by an employment screening strategy are likely slipping past UK businesses. With one third of respondents claiming that false details on candidates CVs have had a large impact on their business, the need for a background check service seems apparent.
Educational qualifications appear to be particularly open to misrepresentation, according to the figures.
78% of those who said they had experienced misrepresentation on CVs said they had seen candidates inflate their degrees, whilst 38% had encountered falsified A-level or GCSE level qualifications. A further 55% said they had seen unqualified candidates claiming to hold a degree level certification, whilst 20% said that candidate’s had claimed on their CVs that they had attended a more prestigious establishment than they had in reality.
The second biggest area of concern was the prevalence of false or misleading references. 68% of respondents said they had encountered this in the past. Other areas of the CV open to abuse include misrepresentation of experience and competency – encountered by 40% of firms – whilst 28% said they had seen experienced false facts about employment details such as length of employment or salary.
The survey also revealed that the biggest issue for vetting incoming staff for businesses was the accuracy, reliability and validity of information provided by referencing (35%). 16% said that companies providing references were often unwilling to give anything but the most basic information on a candidate’s skills, knowledge, technical ability or experience.

